Re: [DynInst_API:] Question about using Dyninst for static instrumentation

[Ray Chen <rchen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

Can provide the exact text of the error?  Other details like hardware
and OS information would also be helpful.  I was able to compile and
run your example without error on my Ubuntu 12.04 (x86/64) machine.

If your assert error looks like "Assertion `rtlib.size()' failed", you
need to set the DYNINSTAPI_RT_LIB environment variable to the location
of your Dyninst runtime library (a file called libdyninstAPI_RT.so).

- Ray

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:03 PM, êíí <kimpooh2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello, I'm Taehwan Kim, a Ph.D student at Hongik University in South Korea.
> I read PASTE '11 article about Dyninst, that is so impressive for me.
>
> I want to do various tests using Dyninst. Dyninst seems to be a very useful
> instrumentation tool, but I have several problems while I using this tool.
>
> I would like to know the destination address of indirect branch instructions
> during run-time. So, I'm trying to instrument a short snippet code at the
> points targeting indirect branch instructions. I used static instrumentation
> methods, but it didn't normally work. Mutator cannot convert a sample binary
> to mutatee.
>
> I saw the error message of function assert(), however, it is difficult to
> know exactly what it mean. So, I would like to know your opinion about my
> code.
>
> Best regards.
>
> - Kim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dyninst-api mailing list
> Dyninst-api@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api