Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:16:54 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | "Mike Marty" <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | RE: [Gems-users] [GEMS] using condor for GEMS |
We use Condor's "vanilla universe" in which jobs are _not_ migrated. Therefore, our binaries do not need to be re-linked. --Mike -----Original Message----- From: gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nauman Rafique Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:10 PM To: gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Gems-users] [GEMS] using condor for GEMS My perception is that condor requires your binaries to be rebuilt with condor libraries. Can anybody hint on that assumption, and workaround? Thanks -- Nauman _______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] [GEMS] using condor for GEMS, Nauman Rafique |
---|---|
Next by Date: | , (nil) |
Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] [GEMS] using condor for GEMS, Nauman Rafique |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] Error after ruby0.init, Weihang Jiang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |