Re: [Gems-users] Comparig Ruby Cycles with Number of Instructions Executed

[Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>]

Marco,

The count of instructions executed is returned by Simics, and measures the number of instructions executed since the simulated machine was started -- *not* the number since the checkpoint was loaded. Since ruby is present only during the run of the benchmark, ruby_cycles does not include machine setup time.

Regards,
Dan Gibson

Marco Tirado wrote:

Hello:

 

We are simulating a CMP system with 4 to 16 processors using Ruby. When we compare the number of instructions executed with the number of ruby cycles we get strange results, the number of instructions executed by a processor is higher than the number of cycles. Some results are shown bellow:

 

Ruby_cycles: 888027500
instruction_executed: 4532908429 [ 807615319 1253256500 1203266231 1268770379 ]
cycles_per_instruction: 0.783627 [ 1.09957 0.708576 0.738014 0.699912 ]

 

This is for 4 processors. As we can see the number of cycles_per_instruction is less than 1 for three of the processors and this not logical. Some months ago a similar question was posted and this was the reply, I quote:

 

"Ruby_cycles measures simulated time. The value of Ruby_cycles is the count of the number of time the Ruby event queue is invoked in the course of simulation. The Ruby event queue is invoked every SIMICS_RUBY_MULTIPLIER cycles (eg. every 2 cycles, see ruby/config/rubyconfig.defaults) from the Simics event queue associated with Simics processor zero. Each "Ruby cycle" is one simulated cycle of the memory system--analogous to one cycle of a logical "memory" clock. Ruby_cycles are *not* determined by the number of instructions executed on any processor."

 

We have the SIMICS_RUBY_MULTIPLIER = 2 in our simulations also, does this mean that the real number of cycles we have to consider is 2*Ruby_cycles? This would mean that the cycles_per_instruction parameter should also be multiplied by two if we want to get the number of actual cycles per instruction and not the number of ruby cycles per instruction.

 

Thanks in Advance

 

Marco

 

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users