Re: [Gems-users] physical networks

["Mike Marty" <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not currently.  This would be a good extension to Ruby to allow the
FILE_SPECIFIED network to specify different links for different virtual
channels.  

> 
> Can I specify two physical networks in FILE_SPECIFIED
> ?
> 
> For eg: A totally ordered tree for addresses and a
> point-point data network for data.
> 
> Right now, my protocol uses broadcast/unicast messages
> to send these messages but they still travel on the
> same physical network (broadcast tree). So all data
> messages for cache-cache transfers have to still
> travel through the root switch.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
> "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.