Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:58:43 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | "Mike Marty" <mike.marty@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] MOSI_SMP_bcast_1level Vs MOSI_SMP_bcast_dir |
No, MOSI_SMP_bcast.slicc includes the files MOSI_SMP_bcast-cache.sm and MOSI_SMP_bcast-dir.sm. Both files are necessary to build the protocol and model the system. To use this protocol, you must use a HIERARCHICAL_SWITCH interconnect topology which provides the order required of the snooping protocol.
The MOSI_SMP_bcast-dir.sm file models a simple memory controller with fixed access latency. If you want to model an atomic bus instead of a hierarchical switch, you will need to develop it yourself and then develop a new protocol to operate on it --Mike On Dec 12, 2007 10:53 AM, Dimitris Tsaliagos <tsaliag@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] MOSI_SMP_bcast_1level Vs MOSI_SMP_bcast_dir, Dimitris Tsaliagos |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Fwd: Re: LogTM not aborting, Jayaram Bobba |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] MOSI_SMP_bcast_1level Vs MOSI_SMP_bcast_dir, Dimitris Tsaliagos |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] MOSI_SMP_bcast finite state machine, nikiforg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |