Re: [Gems-users] flushing L1 caches


Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:28:26 -0600
From: Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] flushing L1 caches
This is a vector/array bounds assertion. Apparently some code in flush is accessing a Vector<L1Cache_Entry> with an offset too large for the specified size of the vector. As a first step, track down places were vectors are indexed in your call stack -- or better yet, attach gdb when you get the assertion and pop the call stack a few times to find the right spot.

Regards,
Dan

Mladen Nikitovic wrote:
I have reproduced the error and this is the message I get from 
Simics/GEMS when I try to do the flush:


simics> c
before flush (8023)
failed assertion 'index < m_size' at fn TYPE& Vector<TYPE>::ref(int) 
[with TYPE = L1Cache_Entry] in ../common/Vector.h:168
failed assertion 'index < m_size' at fn TYPE& Vector<TYPE>::ref(int) 
[with TYPE = L1Cache_Entry] in ../common/Vector.h:168
At this point you might want to attach a debug to the running and get to the
crash site; otherwise press enter to continue
PID: 3981
Warning: Interrupt key pressed more than once.
         Pressing it again will force Simics back to the command prompt.
         This may corrupt the running simulation.
         Try waiting for Simics to stop first.
USER INTERRUPT: Interrupt key pressed multiple times.
Returning to prompt.
simics>


Hopefully this can help someone to shed some light on this matter.

Best Regards,
Mladen

Mladen Nikitovic wrote:
  
Hi,

I'm trying to implement a function that flushes the L1 caches.  You can 
see from my previous posts that I have arrived at a solution that 
involves some augmentation of protocol code etc. But, the final thing is 
actually implementing the flush in the Sequencer, which was supposed to 
be done be walking the I and D-cache entries and sending invalidation 
request via the mandatory queue. I have tried to do that but the 
simulation crashes when I try call the flush at the point of shutting 
down one of the processors.

Implementation-wise, is there anything in the following function that 
should change?

Thanks.

Regards,
Mladen

void Sequencer::flushL1caches(int cpu)
{
  Time latency = SEQUENCER_TO_CONTROLLER_LATENCY;
  CacheMsg Imsg, Dmsg;
  int i,j, Iassoc, Dassoc, Isets, Dsets;

  Imsg.setType(CacheRequestType_INVALIDATE);
  Dmsg.setType(CacheRequestType_INVALIDATE);

  Isets = 
m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_L1IcacheMemory_vec[m_version]->getCacheNumSets();
  Dsets = 
m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_L1DcacheMemory_vec[m_version]->getCacheNumSets();

  Iassoc = 
m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_L1IcacheMemory_vec[m_version]->getCacheAssoc();
  Dassoc = 
m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_L1DcacheMemory_vec[m_version]->getCacheAssoc();

  for(i=0; i<Isets; i++) {
    for(j=0; i<Iassoc; j++) {
      
Imsg.setAddress(m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_L1IcacheMemory_vec[m_version]->getAddress(i,j)); 

      m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_mandatoryQueue_vec[m_version]->enqueue(Imsg, 
latency);
    }
  }

  for(i=0; i<Dsets; i++) {
    for(j=0; i<Dassoc; j++) {
      
Dmsg.setAddress(m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_L1DcacheMemory_vec[m_version]->getAddress(i,j)); 

      m_chip_ptr->m_L1Cache_mandatoryQueue_vec[m_version]->enqueue(Dmsg, 
latency);
    }
  }
}

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.

  
    


_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.


  

-- 
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]