Well there are no guarantees that the protocol is bug free, but as far
as I know it works fine. If I recall correctly, it doesn't model
MSHRs (i.e. TBETable) at the L2 controllers.
--Mike
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:33 AM, divya ramakrishnan
<tickly2002192@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The MESI_CMP_directory protocol has some problems with the profiling of L2
> cache misses and this option has been commented. I wanted to know if the
> protocol is functioning correctly apart from this profiling error. Has
> someone tried using this protocol? I could make the changes for the
> profiling portion. Kindly let me know.
>
> Thank you,
> Divya Ramakrishnan
>
>
> ________________________________
> Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to know how.
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
> "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
>
>
>
|