Hi,
As far as I know, GEMS v2.1 does not support nested
transaction, right?
What will happen to EE/EL/LL TM if we call
BEGIN_TRANSACTION(1);
BEGIN_TRANSACTION(1);
BEGIN_TRANSACTION(1);
…
COMMIT_TRANSACTION(1);
COMMIT_TRANSACTION(1);
COMMIT_TRANSACTION(1);
Like this?
I tested this code and there was no problem, but I want to
make sure on this. It is treated as one large transaction, right?
Otherwise, do we have to be careful not to make multiple
“BEGIN_TRANSACTION(n);” calls or is GEMS smart enough to ignore
multiple BEGIN_TRANSACTIONs?
Thanks in advance.
- Byong Wu "Bernard" Chong
bernard.chong@xxxxxxxx
bchong@xxxxxxxxxxx