Date: | Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:04:59 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | sparsh mittal ISU <sparsh@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] A question about opal |
Thanks a lot. I have a further question. If I do: opal0.sim-step 2000 c 2000 opal0.sim-step 2000 then have I executed 2000 instructions through opal, then 2000 through simics and again through opal or is the last opal0.sim-step command ineffective and should have been opal0.sim-step 4000? Thanks Sparsh On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> wrote: It has been ages since I used opal, but as I recall, that is the expected behavior, strange though it is. If you want opal to step fifty MORE instructions, try opal0.sim-step 550. -- Thanks and Regards Sparsh Mittal Graduate Student Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University, Iowa, USA |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Garnet: Does NetworkInterface_d not check protocol buffer availability?, Niket Agarwal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] How to refer to the variables belonging to L1cachememory of another node?, 王颖 |
Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] A question about network creating on a single chip, MaDafan |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] Array types in SLICC?, Byn Choi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |