Date: | Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:50:18 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] addresses for L1 and L2 caches, virtual or physical? |
All addresses in Ruby are physical addresses. In some cases, the virtual address is available for profiling, but it is not used by the caches themselves. Regards, Dan On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:14 AM, dai jianwei <adaihf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi, all -- http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq! |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] how does L1 cache with block state "S" handle Fwd_GetS from L2 cache, Niket Agarwal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] how does L1 cache with block state "S" handle Fwd_GetS from L2 cache, Greg Byrd |
Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] addresses for L1 and L2 caches, virtual or physical?, dai jianwei |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] A few doubts regarding garnet, gems and errors faced during simulations, Joshi,Madhura R |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |