Re: [Gems-users] addresses for L1 and L2 caches, virtual or physical?


Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:50:18 -0500
From: Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] addresses for L1 and L2 caches, virtual or physical?
All addresses in Ruby are physical addresses. In some cases, the virtual address is available for profiling, but it is not used by the caches themselves.

Regards,
Dan

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:14 AM, dai jianwei <adaihf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, all

  Currently, I am trying to simulate a two-level cache system, which each core has its private L1 cache and L2 cache is shared by all the cores.  I have a question about the addresses used by the L1 and L2 cache. What type of addresses used by them? Both of them use Physical address or L1 uses virtual address and L2 uses Physical address? 

  Thanks a lot for your help. 


Jianwei 

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.





--
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]