Date: | Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:49:29 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Average packet latency VS. Ruby cycles |
1. Read section 6 of http://www.cs.wisc.edu/multifacet/papers/caecw02_workloads.pdf
2. Many protocols cause multiple traversals of the network -- 7% gain each time sums to greater than 11%.
Regards, Dan On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:04 PM, fubinzhang <fubinzhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi all, -- http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq! |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Average packet latency VS. Ruby cycles, Miray Kas |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] 答复: Average packet latency VS. Ruby cycles, fubinzhang |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Average packet latency VS. Ruby cycles, Miray Kas |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] 答复: Average packet latency VS. Ruby cycles, fubinzhang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |