Date: | Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:44 -0400 |
---|---|
From: | Aoxiang Tang <soartang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] An old question about Ruby Cycles and Simics Cycles |
Hi Philips, Thanks for your answer. Let me rephrase and correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you again. The ratio between cpu cycle time (or rather simics cycle time) and ruby's cycle time is SIMICS_RUBY_MILTIPLIER right? Suppose it's 2. In your case, the executed time should be "ruby's cycles * 2 * 1/950M". You say that we need to make sure the memory latency parameters are set with respect to the chosen clock speed. Does the clock mean the cpu clock? Usually we use cpu clock to represent the latency. For example, 6 cycles to access L2. But in ruby's default configuration, all the time related parameters are specified in the unit of ruby cycles. For example, still suppose the SIMICS_RUBY_MULTIPLIER is 2. In the case, I should specify 6/2 for the L2 latency, right? best Aoxiang On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Philip Garcia <pcgarcia@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] An old question about Ruby Cycles and Simics Cycles, Philip Garcia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] An old question about Ruby Cycles and Simics Cycles, Philip Garcia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] An old question about Ruby Cycles and Simics Cycles, Philip Garcia |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] An old question about Ruby Cycles and Simics Cycles, Philip Garcia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |