[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Condor-users] condor on windows server 2003
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:30:04 -0500
- From: "Bryan S. Maher" <Bryan.Maher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Condor-users] condor on windows server 2003
> ...then Condor would behave as you described.
Sorry, that is what I was implying but should have been more clear.
[mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Colin Stolley
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:03 PM
To: Condor-Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [Condor-users] condor on windows server 2003
>I have the following in my condor_config file:
> VM1_USER = MYDOMAIN\CONDOR
> EXECUTE_LOGIN_IS_DEDICATED = TRUE
>According to Collin, making the login dedicated allows condor to assume
all processes in that user context belong to the job and can be managed
> By consequence, jobs vacated by VM1 would kill jobs run by VM2.
Not exactly. VM1_USER is defined as MYDOMAIN\CONDOR, but VM2 is
undefined, meaning it will use condor-reuse-vm2. If you said,
VM2_USER = MYDOMAIN\CONDOR
then Condor would behave as you described.
Condor-users mailing list