AW: [Condor-users] Accumulated usage

["Thomas Bauer" <tombauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
I'm not 100% sure, but I think it is RUN_TIME, because it should increase
the user-priority-level wether your job is running or is staying idle but
claiming a node.

Just my thoughts,
Thomas Bauer
--------------------------------------------
Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster
Institut fuer Festkoerpertheorie
Wilhelm-Klemm-Str. 10
D 48149 Muenster
++49 (251) 8339040
--------------------------------------------
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Steffen Grunewald
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Juni 2004 08:52
An: Condor Users
Betreff: [Condor-users] Accumulated usage

Hi,

I use "condor_userprio -all -allusers" to watch over user priorities and
accumulated usage times. What exactly is counted into the "Accumulated
Usage" field? Is it RUN_TIME or CPU_TIME (in terms of condor_q output,
without or with the -cpu option)? There might be a discrepancy between
Condor's output and the values the jobs report themselves. Just checking...

Cheers,
 Steffen
--
Steffen Grunewald * * * Merlin cluster admin (http://pandora.aei.mpg.de)
Albert-Einstein-Institut (MPI Gravitationsphysik, http://www.aei.mpg.de)
       Science Park Golm, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
e-mail: steffen.grunewald(*)aei.mpg.de * +49-331-567-{fon:7233,fax:7298}

_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing list
Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users