You would need to send some log files for further information, also your
submit file.
It says they don't match, so have a look at the requirements in the submit
file.
Is the OpSys and Arch the same on machine they run on and all the others?
JK
-----Original Message-----
*From:* condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]*On Behalf Of *Partha sarathi
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:27 PM
*To:* Condor-Users Mail List
*Subject:* Re: [Condor-users] problem with condor_q -analyze
when i give a *condor_q -run* i see only one job getting processed on one
machine and even the jobs are there they are not going the other machines
in
the pool.......I can see the condor processes running on all the machines
but i have no clue why these machines are not able to process the
jobs........in the previous mail i sent the *condor_q
-analyze*also.....please help me out........
[condor@Perfcoelnx3 bin]$ ./condor_q -run
-- Submitter: Perfcoelnx3 : <10.237.226.83:21193> : Perfcoelnx3
ID OWNER SUBMITTED RUN_TIME HOST(S)
66.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+04:50:28 Perfcoelnx3
[condor@Perfcoelnx3 bin]$ ./condor_q
-- Submitter: Perfcoelnx3 : <10.237.226.83:21193> : Perfcoelnx3
ID OWNER SUBMITTED RUN_TIME ST PRI SIZE CMD
66.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+04:41:52 R 0 9.8 partha2.out
67.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha3.out
68.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha4.out
69.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha5.out
70.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha6.out
71.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha7.out
72.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha8.out
73.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha9.out
74.0 condor 6/5 07:03 0+00:00:00 I 0 9.8 partha10.out
9 jobs; 8 idle, 1 running, 0 held
On 6/6/07, Partha sarathi <jinka.partha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My jobs are processed on the same mahcine frm which they are
> submitted...i have no idea why they are not going to other
> machines.......can somebody give me a clue what is going wrong...........
>
>
> i gave a condor_q -analyaze , after submitting jobs and my output is
>
>
> 069.000: Run analysis summary. Of 3 machines,
> 2 are rejected by your job's requirements
> 0 reject your job because of their own requirements
> 1 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
> 0 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
> 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
> 0 are available to run your job
> ---
> 070.000: Run analysis summary. Of 3 machines,
> 2 are rejected by your job's requirements
> 0 reject your job because of their own requirements
> 1 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
> 0 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
> 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
> 0 are available to run your job
> ---
> 071.000: Run analysis summary. Of 3 machines,
> 2 are rejected by your job's requirements
> 0 reject your job because of their own requirements
> 1 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
> 0 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
> 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
> 0 are available to run your job
> ---
> 072.000: Run analysis summary. Of 3 machines,
> 2 are rejected by your job's requirements
> 0 reject your job because of their own requirements
> 1 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
> 0 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
> 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
> 0 are available to run your job
> ---
> 073.000: Run analysis summary. Of 3 machines,
> 2 are rejected by your job's requirements
> 0 reject your job because of their own requirements
> 1 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
> 0 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
> 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
> 0 are available to run your job
> ---
> 074.000: Run analysis summary. Of 3 machines,
> 2 are rejected by your job's requirements
> 0 reject your job because of their own requirements
> 1 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
> 0 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
> 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
> 0 are available to run your job
>
>
>
> On 5/31/07, Ian Chesal <ICHESAL@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> >
> > > initally it was like
> > >
> > > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomainperfcoelnx3 localhost
> > >
> > > but i changed it with all the machines in the pool like
> > >
> > > 127.0.0.1 perfcoelnx3
> > > 10.237.234.... second m/c
> > > 10.237.234.... third m/c
> >
> > This is wrong. It should be:
> >
> > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
> > 10.237.234.... perfcoelnx3
> >
> > Right now you've got perfcoelnx3 resolving to the loopback address on
> > the machine. Kind of a circular route.
> >
> > This also explains your condor_status issues in the other email thread
> > BTW.
> >
> > - Ian
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Condor-users mailing list
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
a
> > subject: Unsubscribe
> > You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
> >
> > The archives can be found at:
> > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
![[Computer Systems Lab]](https://www-auth.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}