Re: [Condor-users] GCB question

[Matthew Farrellee <mfarrellee@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel Forrest wrote:
> We have a couple of jobs that have flocked to the UWCS condor pool.
>
> They show up in "condor_status -claimed" like this:
>
> Name          OpSys  Arch        LoadAv RemoteUser           ClientMachine  
>
> slot1@macaron LINUX       INTEL  1.010  szhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  atlas-gcb04.cs.
> slot2@macaron LINUX       INTEL  1.030  szhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  atlas-gcb04.cs.
>
>
> Note the "ClientMachine" column.  Is this normal?  This completely
> breaks the possibility of using ClientMachine as a constraint to find
> flocked jobs in a remote pool.
>
> Is this the expected behavior?

You'd expect the private ip/hostname of the claiming machine to be there 
instead of the site's gcb broker? The claim code currently looks at the 
connecting socket's endpoint to determine the ClientMachine. Maybe that 
should be changed.

Best,


matt