Re: [Condor-users] adding another submit host

[Mag Gam <magawake@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thankyou!



On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Matthew Farrellee <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> condor_q -direct? You're using Quill.
>
> Check the docs on HA for the Schedd, it's active-passive.
>
> Best,
>
>
> matt
>
> On 03/26/2010 07:47 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
>> eh, this does not work.
>>
>> condor_q -direct schedd on the second submit host does not work. Even
>> before (naturally) and after the rsync.
>>
>> On my second submit host I have the following running:
>> condor_master
>> condor_collector
>> condor_schedd
>> condor_procd  (with a lock?)..i am guessing this is normal.
>>
>> One thing I can do is submit jobs using the second host, but my
>> primary host does not see the job submitted with this host. How can I
>> make that appear?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Mag Gam <magawake@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Will try and let you know.
>>>
>>> I think the HAD is too complicated to setup therefore there should be
>>> an alternative to setup another submit host similar to Sun Grid
>>> Engine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Farrellee <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 03/21/2010 09:49 AM, Mag Gam wrote:
>>>>> I currently have only 1 submit host in my pool. I would like to add
>>>>> another one. Instead of using the High Availability daemon
>>>>> (http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/manual/v7.2/3_1Introduction.html#9351)
>>>>> I would like to simply rsync the spool directory over. I will ofcourse
>>>>> run another collector on this second submit host and when the
>>>>> production negotiator is down I can manually start up the negotiator
>>>>> on this server. Would this work? Has anyone been doing this?
>>>>
>>>> Never tried, but if you are doing manual fail-over I don't see why rsync wouldn't work. As long as your rsync is atomic for the entire SPOOL contents.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> matt
>>>>
>>>
>
>