[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Condor-users] FW: Is condor_q -better-analyze in windows removedfrom version 7.6.4?



The reason I asked was when I compared the results from a Linux and a Windows machines, the output was different. The other day I troubleshoot some random jobs from one of my users, the jobs were idle for a long period of time while they were plenty idle nodes to accept the jobs. When I ran the condor_q –better-analyze, it came back with something similar to what you are posting below but when I ran condor_q –better-analyze on a Linux machine, the output was more vast and specific. That led me to  check the condor_q –help and that is when I saw the –better-analyze option was gone.

 

Alex

 

From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Chesal
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 5:34 PM
To: Condor-Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [Condor-users] FW: Is condor_q -better-analyze in windows removedfrom version 7.6.4?

 

On Thursday, 27 October, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Alas, Alex [FEDI] wrote:

Anyone?

Works for me in so much as the option is valid. The output isn't helpful in my test case:

 

C:\>condor_version

$CondorVersion: 7.6.4 Oct 17 2011 BuildID: 378655 PRE-RELEASE-UWCS $

$CondorPlatform: x86_winnt_5.1 $

 

C:\>condor_q

 

 

-- Submitter: Administrator@winxpcm : <192.168.1.85:2005> : winxpcm

 ID      OWNER            SUBMITTED     RUN_TIME ST PRI SIZE CMD

   8.0   Administrator  10/27 16:32   0+00:19:12 I  0   2.7  sleeper.exe --min=

   8.4   Administrator  10/27 16:32   0+00:01:03 R  0   2.7  sleeper.exe --min=

   8.5   Administrator  10/27 16:32   0+00:00:00 I  0   2.7  sleeper.exe --min=

   8.6   Administrator  10/27 16:32   0+00:00:00 I  0   2.7  sleeper.exe --min=

   8.7   Administrator  10/27 16:32   0+00:00:00 I  0   2.7  sleeper.exe --min=

   8.8   Administrator  10/27 16:32   0+00:00:00 I  0   2.7  sleeper.exe --min=

   8.9   Administrator  10/27 16:32   0+00:00:00 I  0   2.7  sleeper.exe --min=

 

7 jobs; 6 idle, 1 running, 0 held

 

C:\>condor_q -better-analyze 8.0

 

 

-- Submitter: Administrator@winxpcm : <192.168.1.85:2005> : winxpcm

---

008.000:  Run analysis summary.  Of 1 machines,

      0 are rejected by your job's requirements

      0 reject your job because of their own requirements

      0 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool

      1 match but reject the job for unknown reasons

      0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job

      0 match but are currently offline

      0 are available to run your job

        Last successful match: Thu Oct 27 16:32:59 2011

        Last failed match: Thu Oct 27 16:58:43 2011

        Reason for last match failure: no match found

 

 

 

Regards,

- Ian

 

 


---

Ian Chesal

 

Cycle Computing, LLC

Leader in Open Compute Solutions for Clouds, Servers, and Desktops

Enterprise Condor Support and Management Tools

 

http://www.cyclecomputing.com

http://www.cyclecloud.com

http://twitter.com/cyclecomputing