[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HTCondor-users] purpose of SHADOW_WORKLIFE option
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:27:41 -0500
- From: "John (TJ) Knoeller" <johnkn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] purpose of SHADOW_WORKLIFE option
There is no good reason for it to be anything other than forever.
I suspect that the value was set to be conservative when the feature of
shadow re-use was first added.
We will be changing the default for SHADOW_WORKLIFE to something more
reasonable for the next development release.
On 3/26/2014 4:23 AM, Pek Daniel wrote:
Is there any practical use case which requires setting SHADOW_WORKLIFE
other than "infinite"? What's the point of not reusing shadow
processes forever? Is there any memory leak in it which requires this
HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
The archives can be found at: