Mailing List ArchivesPublic Access |
![[Computer Systems Lab]](https://www-auth.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}
|
Mailing List ArchivesPublic Access |
|
|
Hi, the htcondor doc states : “Note that a job specifying a value for the
AccountingGroup ClassAd attribute that lacks at least one period in the specification will cause the job to not be considered part of a group when negotiating, even if the
group name (highest within the hierarchy) has a quota. Furthermore, there will be no warnings that the group quota is not in effect for the job, as this syntax defines group accounting.” A bit further in the doc , it is said “the (…)remaining machine assigned to job submitters in the parent group,
group_stat” I’d like to ask if it would be possible to give an exemple/clarify this first paragraph ? I indeed thought the first paragraph might explain the atlas effective quota (0) bellow, but the 2nd paragraph seems to mean that even if the subgroup is wrong, the primary group quota would be used… ? # condor_userprio -all Last Priority Update: 6/25 14:13 Group Effective Config Use Subtree Effective Real Priority Res Total Usage Usage Last Time Since Requested User Name Quota Quota Surplus Quota Priority Priority Factor In Use (wghted-hrs) Start Time Usage Time Last Usage Resources ----------------------------------- --------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ -------- --------- ------ ------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- group_atlas 0.00 0.33 Regroup 487.95 1176.82 100000.00 1320 1037210.12 9/10/2014 11:25 6/25/2015 14:13 <now> 1192 admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 908.85 9/10/2014 11:39 6/25/2015 10:15 0+03:58 pilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 880.15 9/10/2014 11:25 6/25/2015 10:22 0+03:51 production@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 117682032.00 1176.82 100000.00 1320 1035432.88 9/10/2014 12:07 6/25/2015 14:13 <now> group_alice 80.23 0.05 Regroup 80.23 2.00 100000.00 2 298768.59 2/11/2015 07:47 6/25/2015 14:13 <now> 2 pilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 219.64 2/11/2015 11:25 6/25/2015 10:11 0+04:01 admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 200000.00 2.00 100000.00 2 298548.22 2/11/2015 07:47 6/25/2015 14:13 <now> group_cms 304.51 0.21 Regroup 304.51 17.00 100000.00 17 560510.19 9/22/2014 19:10 6/25/2015 14:13 <now> 17 admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 978.47 9/22/2014 19:40 6/25/2015 14:04 0+00:08 production@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 749.61 9/22/2014 19:20 6/25/2015 09:58 0+04:15 pilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1700119.25 17.00 100000.00 17 558788.19 9/22/2014 19:10 6/25/2015 14:13 <now> <none> 1464.00 0.00 yes 1464.00 0.50 100000.00 0 869.46 7/29/2014 16:27 6/25/2015 14:10 0+00:02 0 group_ops@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 29.12 7/31/2014 08:26 6/25/2015 10:23 0+03:50 group_alice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 180.65 2/11/2015 10:52 6/25/2015 10:07 0+04:05 group_ops.admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 50000.00 0.50 100000.00 0 652.60 7/30/2014 17:21 6/25/2015 14:10 0+00:02 ----------------------------------- --------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ -------- --------- ------ ------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- Number of users: 11 Regroup 1339 1897368.50 6/24/2015 14:14 0+23:59 Now concerning the API : I’d like to graph the user priorities using graphite so that I can tell at once who has the highest priority just looking at one graph – and I’d also like to graph quotas to see how they evolve
compared to the priorities to see if anything is not working as expected… Unfortunately, I don’t see anything in the pyhon (or perl ?) bindings that would enable me to graph quotas (I only see the getPriorities() function…) : any idea ? (condor 8.2 here) Thanks && regards Frederic |