[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HTCondor-users] Possible bug using condor_submit?
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:42:22 -0500
- From: Michael V Pelletier <Michael.V.Pelletier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] Possible bug using condor_submit?
> From: John M Knoeller <johnkn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: HTCondor-Users Mail List <htcondor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 11/24/2015 10:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] Possible bug using
> Sent by: "HTCondor-users" <htcondor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Yep that a bug. -append N=5 should behave as if N=5 was right
> (first) Queue statement.
> I have used that technique myself.
> It looks like in 8.4.2 this will work as a prefix, but not using -append.
>  Cat foo.submit
> output = out$(Process).txt
> executable = /bin/hostname
> queue $(Num:3)
> Condor_submit 'Num=5' foo.submit
> Submitting job(s).....
> 5 job(s) submitted to cluster 78.
This is an upgrade blocker for at least one of my
pools since the users
leveraged -append quite a bit in order to integrate
job-construction shell scripts.