Re: [HTCondor-users] proposed change in DAGMan

[Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/15/2016 01:08 PM, R. Kent Wenger wrote:

> The proposed change is that, if DAGMan is "stuck" because all queued
> node jobs are on hold (and there are no ready jobs, running PRE/POST
> scripts, etc.), DAGMan will consider this a failure and abort the DAG
> (which results in all queued node jobs being removed, and a rescue DAG
> being generated).

What about an equivalent of PeriodicRemove that we could set to e.g.
(time() - QDate) > 360

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature