[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HTCondor-users] User process tree w/PPID=1 : not valid (runaway/breakaway), confirmed?
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:10:42 +0000 (GMT)
- From: Winnie Lacesso <Winnie.Lacesso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] User process tree w/PPID=1 : not valid (runaway/breakaway), confirmed?
Bonjour! Thank you!
condor_who returns output very much like qstat -n, including the PID
column! So there's exactly what wanted (THANK YOU!) & can confirm those
cms457 process trees with PPID=1 are indeed not legit = kill them!
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Iain Bradford Steers wrote:
> Also is this htcondor cluster sandboxed by pid_namespaces and/or cgroups?
> You can tell from the worker-node by:
> ~]# condor_config_val USE_PID_NAMESPACES
root@sm09> condor_config_val USE_PID_NAMESPACES
> ~]# condor_config_val BASE_CGROUP
root@sm09> condor_config_val BASE_CGROUP
Not defined: BASE_CGROUP
Just saw your reply Andrew - will look into that. Lots to learn.
pbs/tq/maui + htcondor Rosetta Stone anywhere??