I think John wants the old ClassAd format, but is mystified as to why it is
changing true to 1 and false to 0. It shouldn't be necessary, right?
-alain
At 06:52 PM 3/28/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>When you declare your PrettyPrint object you want to do the following:
>
> PrettyPrint pp;
> pp.SetOldClassAd( false );
>
>This only exists for purposes of back compatibility. If you have any
>other questions let me know.
>
>On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, John Bethencourt wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm sending a ClassAd over a Sock using putOldClassAd and
> getOldClassAd,
> > and it seems to be getting altered in the process. Before sending, it looks
> > like this (as output by a PrettyPrint):
> >
> > [
> > Requirements = true;
> > MyType = "Job";
> > TargetType = "Machine"
> > ]
> >
> > After sending, it looks like this (as output by a PrettyPrint):
> >
> > [
> > Requirements = 1;
> > MyType = "Job";
> > TargetType = "Machine"
> > ]
> >
> > Here are code fragments:
> >
> > (Client)
> >
> > string adString;
> > pp.Unparse(adString, requestAd);
> > printf("The ad is this: \n%s\n\n", adString.data());
> >
> > if (!putOldClassAd(sock, *requestAd)) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "Error: unable to send ClassAd\n");
> > }
> > sock->end_of_message();
> >
> >
> > (Server)
> >
> > ClassAd *requestAd = new ClassAd;
> > if (!getOldClassAd(s, *requestAd)) {
> > dprintf(D_ALWAYS, "Check command did not send a classad!\n");
> > delete requestAd;
> > s->end_of_message();
> > return FALSE;
> > }
> > s->end_of_message();
> >
> > string adString;
> > pp.Unparse(adString, requestAd);
> > dprintf(D_ALWAYS, "The ad is this: \n%s\n\n", adString.data());
> >
> >
> > Any ideas about what might be going on are appreciated.
> >
> > John
> > Condor Classads Info:
> > http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/classad/
> >
> >
>
>- Nick
>
>
>
>Condor Classads Info:
>http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/classad/
|