Re: [classad-users] Bug related to keywords

[Alain Roy <roy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 04:36 PM 6/16/2005 -0500, Marvin Solomon wrote:
> I prefer Swaroop's suggestion to modify the unparsing rules.  The change 
> to the
> refman would be to change Section 3.3.1 to read
>     If the sequence conforms to the syntax of unquoted_name and is not a
>                                                             ++++++++++++
>     reserved word, the attribute name may be represented using either syntax.
>     +++++++++++++
> and 3.3.3 to read
>     The canonical unparsing of an attribute name is simply the name itself if
>     it conforms to the syntax of unquoted_name in Table 4 and is not a 
> reserved
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++
>     word.
>     ++++

So just to clarify--if the name is quoted, then we can use the reserved 
words. Is that correct? I would like to get this into the C++ 
implementation this week, but I want to make sure I understand first.

Thanks,
-alain