Date: | Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:07:24 -0800 |
---|---|
From: | Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC |
On 02/10/2014 06:07 PM, Barton Miller wrote: > Thanks for helping out with this Matt. > > Josh: ProcControl is often a minefield. It is frustrating how intricate > the design gets, just to try to keep uniform semantics across different > OS platforms. We've killed a lot of brain cells in the design, coding > and debugging. Definitely worth getting Matt and Bill's help on this one. Oh, I see the intricacy, and I spent enough time digging at this one that moving just one line seemed too good to be true. :) I'm happy to have help finishing this one off! Thanks, Josh |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] how much work would it be to enable binary rewrite on ARM?, Barton Miller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Josh Stone |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Barton Miller |
Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Josh Stone |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |