Mailing List Archives

Public Access

 		[Computer Systems Lab]

[← Prev]  [Date]  [Next →] [← Prev]  [Thread]  [Next →]

Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC

Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:35:01 -0800
From: Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC 
On 02/11/2014 09:07 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 06:07 PM, Barton Miller wrote:
>> Thanks for helping out with this Matt.
>>
>> Josh: ProcControl is often a minefield.  It is frustrating how intricate 
>> the design gets, just to try to keep uniform semantics across different 
>> OS platforms.   We've killed a lot of brain cells in the design, coding 
>> and debugging.   Definitely worth getting Matt and Bill's help on this one.
> 
> Oh, I see the intricacy, and I spent enough time digging at this one
> that moving just one line seemed too good to be true. :)  I'm happy to
> have help finishing this one off!

Matt's commit 4a1f45e84685 is working great - thanks very much!

Josh
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]
Previous by Date:  Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Josh Stone
Next by Date:  [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] dyninstAPI: Squash library callbacks during exec bootstrap, Josh Stone
Previous by Thread:  Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Josh Stone
Next by Thread:  [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Avoid a destructor race on Counter::locks, Josh Stone
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread]