Mailing List ArchivesPublic Access |
![[Computer Systems Lab]](https://www-auth.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}
|
Mailing List ArchivesPublic Access |
|
| Date: | Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:31:14 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From: | Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | [DynInst_API:] control flow enforcement |
Are there any cases where Intel control flow enforcement might have an
impact with regard to dyninst?
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdfMy brief understanding (starting at page 18 in the doc) is that indirect branch destinations must have a special NOP-like instruction to land on. |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [DynInst_API:] [dyninst/dyninst] 51e831: changes for parallelizing symtabapi, Xiaozhu Meng |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] control flow enforcement, Xiaozhu Meng |
| Previous by Thread: | [DynInst_API:] changes to the cmake args for 10.1, Mark W. Krentel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] control flow enforcement, Barton Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |