Re: [Gems-users] LxCACHE_TRANSITIONS_PER_RUBY


Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:55:28 -0400
From: "Juyoung Jung" <juyoung.jung@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] LxCACHE_TRANSITIONS_PER_RUBY
Hi, Mike.
Thanks for your quick response.
I would like to keep my question for details.

// i.e. the number of ports to each controller
// L1cache is the sum of the L1I and L1D cache ports
For example, let's suppose that we have 2 ports(one input and one output) in L1 cache. Then, should I set L1CACHE_TRANSITIONS_PER_RUBY to 2?
If it is the case, I think it might mean that mandatory queue will be search twice in a cycle, and generate two requests with different addresses individually at the same cycle.
Could you check if I go wrong? Thank you.


Regards,

Young





>Well it determines how many transitions the L1 Controller will process
in a cycle.  For certain protocols, it can be used to approximate bank
contention.  However for any protocol that uses recycle, it is pretty
much meaningless and should probably be set to a high value.

It is specifically used in L1Cache_Controller::wakeup() in the generated
L1Cache_Wakeup.C file.

--Mike


Juyoung Jung wrote:
> Dear Gems-Users,
>
>
> Could anyone explain about what the variable
> "L1CACHE_TRANSITIONS_PER_RUBY_CYCLE" in
> ruby/config/rubyconfig.defaults means?
> The comment in rubyconfig file says the below:
>
> // Number of transitions each controller state machines can complete
> per cycle
> // i.e. the number of ports to each controller
> // L1cache is the sum of the L1I and L1D cache ports
>
> The default value is set to 32 for each type of machines such as L1,
> L2, and Directory. Shoud I set the exact same number as the defined
> ports for this variable?
> I am worrying about this variable's role because I could ran
> simulation without modifying this variable.
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Young
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]