Re: [Gems-users] Processor binding for LogTM


Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:12:17 -0500
From: Jayaram Bobba <bobba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Processor binding for LogTM
The distributed version of LogTM does not handle thread switching and paging.
Hence thread binding is recommended.

Jayaram

Shantanu Gupta wrote:
For correct execution of a multithreaded benchmarks using logTM protocol, is processor binding (pset_bind) necessary ?

If yes, then why does the deque benchmark not have it ?

If no, then how is it guaranteed that a thread will be not be shuffled out of a processor while it is running under a transaction ? What is responsible for ensuring this :
   - logtm coherence protocol
   - logtm transaction manager
   - simics interface, etc..


-Shantanu
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]