Why do you want to avoid a PerfectSwitch? GEMS works by connecting
controllers to the interconnect model.
I've experimented with adding SLICC syntax to allow a controller to
directly access state from another controller. Some of the limited
functionality still exists in SLICC, but I've never really used it for
anything.
--mike
Hi Mike,
I guess, I could not make the question clear. I want to connect L1 controller
and L2 controller (on-chip) without going through Switch. e.g.
ext_node:L1Cache:0 ext_node:L2Cache:0 link_latency:1 bw_multiplier:64
Do you mean this is possible? If so which version of GEMS?
Thanks a lot.
---
Hemayet
Mike Marty wrote:
The current file-specified network allows you to specify any number of
links between switches (via int_node), and then which controllers connect
to switches (via ext_node). The int_node vs. ext_node has nothing to do
with on- or off-chip. Off- or on-chip links just have different latency
and bandwidth parameters
--Mike
Hemayet Hossain wrote:
Hi,
I want to have a direct link between two external nodes and want to
specify these nodes through file specified network. I want to control the
bandwidth through Throttle too. I believe, Current infra-structure does
not support this sort of links. Can anyone please suggest any way to do
this? I would really appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Hemayet Hossain
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
"site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
"site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
|