Date: | Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:00:59 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | "Polina Dudnik" <pdudnik@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Direct Mapped cache query |
You are probably better off just doing what Derek suggested because it is easier and the right thing to do. Polina On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Ashwath Narasimhan <nashwath@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Yes I was getting the assertion in PseudoLRUPolicy. Ok I will modify the code to support direct replacement. Thanks for the Tip. -- Polina Dudnik pdudnik@xxxxxxxxxxx http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~pdudnik/ Department of Computer Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison 6376 Computer Sciences & Statistics Bldg 1210 West Dayton Street Madison, WI 53706-1685 USA |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Direct Mapped cache query, Ashwath Narasimhan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Direct Mapped cache query, Ashwath Narasimhan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Direct Mapped cache query, Ashwath Narasimhan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Direct Mapped cache query, Ashwath Narasimhan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |