Date: | Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:51:26 -0400 |
---|---|
From: | Edward Lee <edwl202@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] Is Ruby Cycles a good performance metric for CC protocol performance? |
Hi all, I am investigating some optimizations in CC protocols. I am using only Ruby so far for my simulations. I was wondering while comparing two protocols of same base like MOESI_SMP_directory (default) versus a modified version of the same protocol, would it be fair to compare the Ruby Cycles performance metric to determine the affect on application execution time. Or should I use Opal to get more accurate results? I am already looking for cache misses especially coherence misses and network utilization parameters including the power model from GARNET. Any suggestion is appreciated. Regards, Ed |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Adding L3, L4 (or beyond) to the system, Greg Byrd |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Adding L3, L4 (or beyond) to the system, HyoukJoong Lee |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] irregular statistics due to the number of messages injected into the network by the coherence protocol, Alberto Ros Bardisa |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] libelf.so.0 and libpython2.4.so problem, Daniel Sánchez Pedreño |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |