Derek Hower wrote:
> Inclusivity/exclusivity is a coherence-level issue. Thus, it is
> determined solely by the behavior of the SLICC generated protocol. To
> the best of my knowledge, all released protocols in GEMS are inclusive.
>
> -Derek
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Edward Lee <
edwl202@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:
edwl202@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to add another cache besides L1/L2 to my target system
> like a victim cache or an RAC. So, I am wondering how to determine
> exclusivity of the caches in GEMS? For example,
> MOESI_SMP_directory protocol has a single SLICC controller for
> L1/L2, does this mean that the L2 is inclusive? Where in the GEMS
> code is this determied?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
>