Re: [Gems-users] Gems cache timing model


Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:42:58 -0500
From: Philip Garcia <pcgarcia@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Gems cache timing model
what protocol are you using, I know many of these parameters aren't used under some protocols, and even if they are, increasing them shouldn't reduce runtime, are you sure you're running on the same checkpoint, and that nothing else changed?

Phil
On Apr 20, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Mark Samuelson wrote:

> We are running a simple program and found increasing the L2 request and response latencies improved both the cache miss rate and the overall runtime.
> 
> Does anyone know what the difference between the request, response, and tag latencies are?
> 
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
> 

[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]