Date: | Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:42:23 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Problem running a workload |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Mahmood Naderan <mahmood.nt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I did that and then some lines inserted in the file. Then I made It is wrong. That message comes from Ruby. You took a checkpoint after loading Ruby, therefore, Ruby is part of the .check file. This is bad, because ruby is then re-loaded out of order with respect to the physical memory object -- I.e., Ruby can't find the physical memory, because it doesn't exist at ruby load-time. Solution: Manually edit your .check file and remove all mention of Ruby. Make a backup before you begin.
Agreed -- it ain't easy. It turns out, running entire operating systems in simulation is tricky.
If you don't start a workload on the target os, then you just run whatever background processes the OS wants to schedule (and/or the idle loop). Regards, Dan
-- http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq! |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Problem running a workload, Mahmood Naderan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] Does REMOVE_SINGLE_CYCLE_DCACHE_FAST_PATH has to be true for all CMP protocols?, lopamudra chatterjee |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Problem running a workload, Mahmood Naderan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Problem running a workload, Mahmood Naderan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |