RE: [Condor-users] Is VirtualMemory updated at intervals?

["Ian Chesal" <ICHESAL@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I really want to believe you but this goes against my observations. My
machines are constantly reporting the full amount of VM for the box
regardless of what's running on them. And I'm running so very memory
intensive apps. Not so much as a twitch in the amount of VM reported by
the vm's on the box. Is it clipped for the Win32 version of condor?

- Ian

> virtual memory is dynamically updated by the startd.
> 
> 	Jeff
> 	Condor Team
> 
> On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:21, Ian Chesal wrote:
> > I don't suppose someone from the Condor team could ring on this 
> > question? I haven't heard from any one...
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > - Ian
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Chesal
> > > Sent: December 22, 2004 4:20 PM
> > > To: Condor-Users Mail List
> > > Subject: [Condor-users] Is VirtualMemory updated at intervals?
> > > 
> > > Page 24 in section 2.5 of the 6.7.2 manual says that 
> VirtualMemory 
> > > is "The amount of currently available virtual memory" for 
> a machine. 
> > > I'm running non-Condor processes that are, according to 
> my machine, 
> > > eating up just about all of the virtual memory on the 
> machine. But 
> > > when I do:
> > > 
> > > condor_status -f "%d\n" virtualmemory <machine>
> > > 
> > > I'm seeing the same number (about 1 GB) reported despite the fact 
> > > that the OS says there is not 1 GB of available virtual 
> memory. This 
> > > is 6.7.2 on Windows XP.
> > > 
> > > Is the VirtualMemory figure for a machine a static or 
> dynamic value?
> > > That entry in the manual led me to believe it was 
> dynamically updated.
> > > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
>