[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Will HAD_CONTROLLEE = SCHEDD can be used for condor_schedd HA .
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:42:37 +0530
- From: Johnson koil Raj <johnson.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Will HAD_CONTROLLEE = SCHEDD can be used for condor_schedd HA .
So now we don't need SCHEDD.lock at spool directory is it am I right.
Instead of keeping $(SPOOL) as shared. Why can't condor_replication
functionality is used for that keeping the directory in sync. so that
dependency from the shared storage will be removed (i.e nfs etc)
Nick LeRoy wrote:
In condor-7.3.2 the new configuration variable HAD_CONTROLLEE is
added. For condor_schedd high availability can I use this variable by
simply by specifying HAD_CONTROLLEE = SCHEDD . If yes is any other
configuration change need for that?
Well, sort of... Yes, the HAD daemon will cause the schedd to be stopped and
started appropriated. However, you'll need to find a means of keep $(SPOOL)
shared. If you're doing this over NFS, then you might also consider using the
schedd specific logic in the master for this -- see 3.11.1 "High Availability
of the Job Queue" in the manual.
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.