On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Michael Hanke <michael.hanke@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:michael.hanke@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:26:02PM -0600, Nathan W. Panike wrote:
> Could this come from a Makefile-like description of the dependencies?
> I have recently developed a Makefile-to-DAG translator and I need
> some more test cases. You could also do a search for Makeflow by
> Doug Thain, which might automate your process if the dependencies
> can be expressed in a Makefile syntax, and is ready to go.
Makeflow is cool -- it is on top of my list of things to package for
Debian (all of the cctools, actually). However, even a Makefile would
probably require all job dependencies being known at submission time of
the first task, right?
Anyway, since makeflow already abstracts SGE and Condor, it might be a
good candidate for an abstraction layer -- i will look into this more
closely.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing listhttp://nd.edu/~ccl/software/makeflow/
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
--
--- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.--
_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
![[Computer Systems Lab]](https://www-auth.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}