Re: [HTCondor-users] condor_userprio issues

[Jon Bernard <jbernard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It looks like we had a another server in the pool running condor_negotiator.

I've shut that down, but now I have two accounting files. My question is: would any usage have been counted by both negotiators? Or would each have accounted only for the jobs it matched?

-----Original Message-----
From: HTCondor-users [mailto:htcondor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Thain
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 4:30 PM
To: htcondor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] condor_userprio issues

WARNING - External email; exercise caution.



On 08/17/2017 09:19 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
> Hi Ivo,
>
> No, but we've been running 8.5.8 since December, and 8.5.6 before 
> that, without seeing this.

I believe that -allusers implies going to the negotiator, but could you verify that you see the same results with

condor_userprio -allusers -all -negotiator?

The problem is either that the users aren't getting updated, or there's stale data somewhere.  When you run the condor_userprio -resetall command, could you save a copy of the accounting log.  For users which seem to have stale start dates, could you check if there are records in the accounting log that look like

105
103 Customer.smith AccumulatedUsage 0.000000
103 Customer.smith WeightedAccumulatedUsage 0.000000
103 Customer.smith BeginUsageTime 1503347355
106


-greg
_______________________________________________
HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users

The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/