[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HTCondor-users] Negotiation submitters sort order



Thanks Thomas.
Indeed, that's working for groups and does not affect users.

Thanks
David


From: HTCondor-users <htcondor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of thomas.hartmann@xxxxxxx <thomas.hartmann@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 11 May 2021 16:28
To: htcondor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <htcondor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] Negotiation submitters sort order
 
Hi David,

you can probably weight the sort order with the current usage
`GroupResourcesInUse` - maybe something like [1] .
But I do not know, if something like that could be realized on the user
level.

Cheers,
   Thomas

[1]
GROUP_SORT_EXPR = ifThenElse(AccountingGroup=?="<none>", 3.4e+38, \
   ifThenElse(regexp("multicore",AccountingGroup),\
     ifThenElse(GroupQuota > 0.0 ,1+GroupResourcesInUse/GroupQuota,5.0),  \
       ifThenElse(GroupQuota > 0.0, GroupResourcesInUse/GroupQuota,\
         3.3e+38\
       )
     )
  )



On 11/05/2021 14.15, duduhandelman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi all,
> All of my users have the same EUP, so the sorting order is actually
> always the same order.
> The problem is more complicated when using concurrency limit, the first
> user on the list will get most resources.
>
> Is there any configuration for that?
>
> Many thanks
> David.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HTCondor-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
> subject: Unsubscribe
> You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users
>
> The archives can be found at:
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/
>