[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HTCondor-users] proper way to check fo undefined classAd in python
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:59:14 -0500
- From: Jason Patton <jpatton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] proper way to check fo undefined classAd in python
Stefano (and others):
I am reminded of when I was recommended to use "is" and "is not" when comparing to None in Python:
The same recommendation applies to comparisons with classad.Value.Error and classad.Value.Undefined, which are similar in function to None, but not similar enough that the ClassAd bindings translate them to None.
I realize this doesn't help with backwards compatibility, and I will make a ticket to improve the Python bindings docs to clearly point out the difference between using "=="/"!=" and "is"/"is not" operators.
On 6/22/22 10:38 AM, Stefano Belforte wrote:
thanks John. I believe that this is correct for classAd language,
but I suspect somehow the bad syntax managed to work inside python bindings up to
HTCondor 8 as indicated in the post mentioned by Jason
since bot in that and in my case the point is the conversion (or not) to a boolean
inside python of the C++ value.
OTOH, I have no concrete evidence that the code I am trying to fix really worked
in the past, nor am in the mood of installing an older condor version to test.
I am quite happy and confident about what I have now.
On 22/06/2022 16:44, John M Knoeller wrote:
!= should never have worked to compare undefined.Â So if this used to work in the python bindings that was a bug.
Undefined is not like other values, it cannot be compared using == or !=, it can only be compared using the exact equality (is or =?=)Â or exact inequality (isnt or =!=) operators
HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
The archives can be found at: