Re: [classad-users] c++ & java inconsistency

["Giuseppe Avellino" <giuseppe.avellino@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hai rotto il ...
 
-----Giuseppe AvellinoGRID R&D GroupDefence, Space & 
Environment Division
 
DATAMAT S.p.A.Via Laurentina, 760 - I - 00143 Rome - Italy<A 
href="">http://www.datamat.it
 
<A 
href="">mailto:giuseppe.avellino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: 
+39 06 5027 4587 (direct) +39 06 5027 4571 (secretary)Fax:   +39 
06 5027 2500
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  <A href="" 
  title=alessandro.maraschini@xxxxxxxxxx>Alessandro Maraschini 
  To: <A 
  href="" 
  title=classad-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>classad-user 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:03 
  PM
  Subject: [classad-users] c++ & java 
  inconsistency
  Hi, while  performing some test I've came across a 
  different behaviour between java & c++ classad implementation. 
  C++ code ===== 
  ClassAdParser cp ; ClassAd* classAd = new ClassAd (); 
  classAd->Insert( "one" ,   cp.ParseExpression(  "-5" ) 
  ); string       buffer=""; 
  PrettyPrint  unp ; unp.Unparse(buffer, classAd  ) ; cout 
  << "OUTPUT = " << buffer << endl << flush ; 
  C++ output ====== 
  OUTPUT =     [ 
          one =  -5 
      ]       
  JAVA code ======== 
      RecordExpr re = new RecordExpr() ; 
      ClassAdParser cp = new ClassAdParser( "-5"  
  )  ;     re.insertAttribute( "one" , cp.parse()  
  );     System.out.println( "OUTPUT: " + re  ); 
  JAVA output ==========   
    OUTPUT: [ one = (-5) ]       
  --------------- 
  As you can see the use of parentesys is different, I don't know wheter it 
  has been fixed in the latest java release but if not, can you please check it? 

  BTW, which should be the right representation ? (I guess it's the second 
  one but... never know..)     
  thank you, 
  Alessandro   -- 
   ***
Alessandro Maraschini
GRID R&D Group
Defence, Space & Environment Division
DATAMAT S.p.A.
Via Laurentina, 760 -I- 00143 Rome - Italy
http://www.datamat.it
mailto:alessandro.maraschini@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: +39 06 5027 4501
Fax: +39 06 5027 2500