shan,
The x86 patch only changes the memory simulator, so it is suitable
for Simics+Ruby alone. The answers to your questions are: in-order, no.
-Min
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 shan wrote :
> Hi,
> I have some questions about the x86 patch.
> Is Gems simulating out-of-order x86 or in-order x86? Will the speculative
> memory accesses on the mis-predicted branch path be simulated in x86
> simulation or not?
> Thanks
> Shan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Dan Gibson
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:51 PM
> To: Gems Users
> Subject: [Gems-users] Ruby x86 Patch, Version 0.4 BETA Released
>
> Hello all!
>
> In response to recent bug reports, Version 0.4 BETA of the Ruby
> SPARCv9-to-x86 patch has been released. You can find it on the GEMS
> distitbution page.
>
> X86 users: Please be sure to check out the CHANGES file.
>
> Be aware that simulations run with versions 0.3 BETA and earlier were
> *NOT* properly accounting for accesses from CPUs other than CPU 0.
>
> Thanks for your patience. Please continue reporting bugs to gems-users,
> or directly to me via gibson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Regards,
> Dan Gibson
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
|