RE: [Gems-users] Does Gems support Linux on SPARC?


Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:14:18 -0500
From: "shan" <shanlu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Gems-users] Does Gems support Linux on SPARC?
I mean _simulating_ a sparc/linux with Simics_Gems.
Emm, "in theory" ...
Thanks very much

-----Original Message-----
From: gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Dan Gibson
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 1:15 PM
To: Gems Users
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Does Gems support Linux on SPARC?

Shan,

Are you thinking of _running_ Simics+Gems on a sparc machine with Linux 
as the OS, or are you thinking of _simulating_ a sparc/linux machine 
with Simics+Gems running on some other host machine?

As far as _running_ Simics+Gems on sparc/linux, Gems's functionality 
will be determined by the host's ability to compile ANSI C++. So, if you 
have a recent version of g++ available on your sparc/linux host, Gems 
should work without any problems.  However, you may want to check that 
Simics itself supports running on a sparc/linux platform, if you haven't 
already.

With regards to _simulating_ a sparc/linux with Simics+Gems, we have 
only had significant experience with sparc targets running Solaris, 
though, in theory, running simulated Linux (on sparc) should not change 
the functionality of Gems.

Regards,
Dan
 

shan wrote:

> Sorry to ask such a simple question. I just started to use Gems.
>
>  
>
> Is Solaris required? In my mind, since Simics support linux on sparc, 
> Gems may also work with linux on sparc. But I am not sure.
>
> Does everybody use Solaris? Is Linux ok?
>
> Thanks a lot!!
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gems-users mailing list
>Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>  
>
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users

[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]