Date: | Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:45:36 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Different cache line sizes? |
Sounds do-able...there might be subtle glitches. Pay attention to
DirectoryMemory.[Ch] about the g_DATA_BLOCK_SIZE.
I might use a different protocol. You might find the MESI_SCMP_bankdirectory protocol available seperately on the download directory easier to understand and work with --Mike mehmetderin.harmanci@xxxxxxx wrote: Hello all, As far as I have seen from the Ruby code, the cache line sizes for L1 and L2 level caches are the same. Is it possible to have the L1 and L2 level cache line sizes different (without breaking down anything, e.g. sharing information in the directories)? Is protocol with shared L2 cache configuration suitable for that (e.g. MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory)? I think of using a single chip ,taking the g_DATA_BLOCK_SIZE size of L1 level caches and another cache line size for L2 level cache. Is that feasible or not? Thanks for your attention. Derin Harmanci _______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search. |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] regd. event queue, Dan Gibson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] MOSI_SMP_bcast : inclusion between L1 and L2, Mike Marty |
Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] Different cache line sizes?, mehmetderin . harmanci |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] Error in TransactionalManager, avadh patel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |