Re: [Gems-users] "DYNAMIC_AF" or "STATIC_AF", question about, opal power

[Guoqiang Yang <nkyangguoqiang@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Serkan Ozdemir,

Thanks for the reply, but I have commented out that line. So the zeros 
have nothing to do with the clear of access counter. I suspect it is all 
about the way that I generate the power consumption for that specific unit.
Yep, I met the same problem and I think it is the code problem. And you 
have to debug it yourself, now I have changed the code kind of a mess, I 
can NOT find exactly which part really solved this problem. But I kind 
of remember it has something to do with the System static object 
pointer, also, something to do with assertion.
I also hope I could get more discussion about whether I'm doing the 
right thing or not. And the way that GEMS guys tread "STATIC_AF" and 
"DYNAMIC_AF" for those "current_UNIT_NAME_power_cc3" is different, and I 
would like someone to make this part a little bit more clear.
Many thanks,

Guoqiang Yang