Date: | Wed, 07 May 2008 22:15:21 -0700 |
---|---|
From: | cge@xxxxxxxx |
Subject: | [Gems-users] L1 v.s. L2 cache miss in MESI_CMP_filter_directory protocol |
Hi, Does anyone know the relationship among L2_cache_total_misses, L1D_cache_total_misses, and L1I_cache_total_misses ? I ran transactional microbenchmarks in MESI_CMP_filter_directory, and obervedthat L2_cache_total_misses is close to (L1D_cache_total_misses + L1I_cache_total_misses). I suppose L2 cache miss should be a lot smaller than L1D_cache_total_misses + L1I_cache_total_misses. Thanks, Cen |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Compiling problems with transaction.c in Gems 2.0, li he |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] routing algorithm, Zhang Yu |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Compiling problems with transaction.c in Gems 2.0, li he |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Compiling problems with transaction.c in Gems 2.0, Guoqiang Yang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |