Re: [Gems-users] Random Tester


Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:10:51 +0200
From: Marco Solinas <marco.solinas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Random Tester
Thanks a lot, Javier! That's exactly what I needed.

Regards,
Marco

Javier Merino ha scritto:
If RANDOMIZATION is set to true, a random time is added to every message
enqueued in a MessageBuffer. See ruby/buffers/MessageBuffer.C  enqueue()

Regards,
Javier Merino

El mié, 01-10-2008 a las 11:31 +0200, Marco Solinas escribió:
Hi list,

when I use the "random tester" (GEMS 1.4) to debug my protocol, I see message interleaving even if the physical NoC architecture (FILE_SPECIFIED) wouldn't allow such kind of race. Reading the PowerPoint slides (isca_tutorial) available in the website, I can read that the tester "randomly inserts delay". My question is: where is this delay inserted? I was wandering that the strange phenomenon I can see while testing could be tiled to such delay (I mean: a random delay in the time a queued message is served might explain such situation). In the case I'm right, could you suggest me the point in the tester or ruby code I have to modify in order to avoid such situation?

Thanks a lot!
Marco

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.



[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]