[Gems-users] Question about MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory

[Abhishek Bhattacharjee <bhattacharjee.abhishek@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everyone --

I was wondering if anyone had any new insight on this issue of whether MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory supports caches with hits under misses and misses under misses?

Thanks!
Abhishek

******************************************************************************************************************************

I guess both the protocols allow hits under misses and misses under  
misses. I am not sure about the "blocking" definition here.
Can someone throw more light?

Cheers,
Niket

On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Abhishek Bhattacharjee wrote:

Hi all --

Looking at the GEMS page on the particular protocols that may be  
used, MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory and MOESI_CMP_directory are listed with  
the primary differences being L1/L2 inclusion. However, I wanted to  
find out if MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory is a blocking protocol...
Thanks!
Abhishek
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users

Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/ 
" to your search.